The original poster asks whether the Fatel Razack was eventually wrecked or dismantled, saying their own search has not supplied an answer. The discussion begins with a specific gap in the ship’s later history rather than a challenge to its significance in local memory.
One respondent guesses that the vessel was sold, dismantled or abandoned. A reply connects that possibility to its place in an empire, but another challenges the assumption about ownership, describing a private commercial vessel. None supplies a linked ownership or disposal record in the exchange reviewed. These are competing explanations, not established findings.
A separate contribution recalls a school research project and possible name changes, including Cecrops and a variant spelling of Futtle Razak. That recollection suggests a route for further investigation; it does not by itself establish that the names identify the same vessel or explain its eventual fate.
The useful disagreement concerns what would count as an answer. A plausible account of an old working ship is different from a traceable record linking its identity, later voyages and final disposition. Other replies move into unrelated voyages or a ferry joke, adding little evidence to the original question.
What the Discussion Reveals
This small exchange shows curiosity about what happened beyond a familiar historical milestone. Its strongest contribution is the unresolved question and the possible search leads, rather than a settled conclusion. Matching contemporary ship registers, ownership changes or a disposal record would move the discussion forward; the absence of those documents in this thread does not prove that no such records survive.