Skip to content

← All news

Government · 2 min read · Published 26 Oct 2026

Land Agency Claims Surface During Budget Review

By the Luk It Hyah newsdesk · Sources · Reporting disclaimer

The Short

A Budget committee exchange raised competing allegations about state-agency road works, procurement and leases. The claims have not been established by an audit in the material reviewed.

Related public figures: Saddam Hosein · Stuart Young

The Full Story

Land and Legal Affairs Minister Saddam Hosein told Parliament’s Standing Finance Committee that Palo Seco Agricultural Enterprises Ltd had been used for road paving and box-drain work before the 2025 election. Opposition MP Stuart Young questioned a TT$150 million allocation to the company in the 2027 Budget. Hosein alleged that some contractors were selected without the usual procurement or contract trail, leaving the State facing payment claims. These are allegations made in a parliamentary exchange, not findings of corruption.

Sources: Trinidad Guardian, 26 Oct ↗

Hosein said part of the new allocation would cover work certified as completed. That makes the project paperwork important: a schedule of approved works, contracts, certification, invoices and payments would show what the proposed allocation actually funds. The Guardian also reported a separate exchange about leases by the Chaguaramas Development Authority around an earlier election. Young and Hosein made opposing political claims; the reviewed report does not supply the lease files or an independent investigation.

Sources: Trinidad Guardian, 26 Oct ↗

The central question is whether the works were authorised, procured and certified under the applicable rules, and which ministry or company is responsible for any unpaid claims. A parliamentary accusation is a reason to inspect documents, but does not identify a contractor as dishonest or prove that public money was lost. The budget line itself should be read with its project schedule rather than treated as evidence of an improper payment.

Sources: Trinidad Guardian, 26 Oct ↗

Evidence and Context

The dispute joins a budget allocation to older decisions about works. A document-by-document timeline could separate completed projects, unpaid certified work and contested procurement.

If valid work is unpaid, contractors and communities face delays. If authorisation failed, taxpayers need an accountable review of how obligations were created.

What Happens Next

Seek PSAEL’s project list, procurement and certification records, the precise 2027 budget line, and any audit or court outcome.

Story-specific reporting note

No contracts, audit findings, payment ledger or court ruling establishing the allegations were available in the reviewed newspaper account.

Sources

How to request a correction

Reader Photos

Share a related photo

Photos are checked before they appear here. The credit name supplied by each contributor is public.

No reader photos have been published for this article yet.